Pick your subject.Matthew 22 Jesus( YAHushua) 37 And he said to him, “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind. 38 This is the great and first commandment. 39 And a second is like it: You shall love your neighbor as yourself.
I'm proud to be an American ''BUT THE TRUTH IS THE TRUTH!''
Why is the Pentagon a pentagram which is a satanic symbol?
A pentagram (sometimes known as a pentalpha or pentangle or, more formally, as a star pentagon) is the shape of a five-pointed star drawn with five straight strokes. The word pentagram comes from the Greek word πεντάγραμμον (pentagrammon), a noun form of πεντάγραμμος (pentagrammos) or πεντέγραμμος (pentegrammos), a word meaning roughly "five-lined" or "five lines", from πέντε (pente), "five" + γραμμή (grammē), "line".
Facts & FiguresThe Pentagon—a building, institution, and symbol—was conceived at the request of Brigadier General Brehon B. Sommervell, Chief of the Construction Division of the Office of the Quartermaster General, on a weekend in mid-July 1941. The purpose was to provide a temporary solution to the War Department’s critical shortage of space. The groundbreaking ceremony took place on September 11, 1941. The building was dedicated on January 15, 1943, nearly 16 months to the day after the groundbreaking.
Prime contract awarded 11 August 1941
Mechanical engineering contract awarded 3 September 1941
Construction began 11 September 1941
There was supposedly an attack on September 11 can you see the symbology of that date and the shape of the pentagon was it a satanic ritual?
And was the attack made up you decide?
**THIS IS A MUST WATCH VIDEO**
THIS VIDEO WILL CHANGE YOUR LIFE!
The Pentagon after 9/11
If you have eyes, you can see There was no jetliner
All those cameras and this is the only vid we have?
These two aerial photographs, of which the second has two enlargements, came from a government (.mil) website. They show debris after workers had moved it into piles. Some people claimed that these photographs showed aircraft debris, but the enlargements show that the debris consists of building components.
Where's the plane?
When you see the Pentagon from this angle (a vantage I bet you've never seen before), the reality of the situation is undeniable. Whatever caused this section of the Pentagon to explode and catch fire was not a passenger jetliner.
That's why you've seen photos of the Pentagon from every conceivable angle - except this one which lets you see what actually happened, and what didn't happen.
There was an almost total absence of plane wreckage outside (or even inside) the Pentagon after it was allegedly hit by the plane
The hole in the building was far too small for the 757 to pass through it without leaving large pieces of wreckage outside
There was no damage to the lawn despite the plane’s engines hanging 15 feet below the rest of the fuselage
The Flight Data Recorder showed that the plane was too high to have knocked over lamp posts or hit the Pentagon (the last second of data before the “crash” was mysteriously absent), and the flight path would not have taken over the lamp posts in any case
Damage to outside ring: people died four rings beyond this
So based on a careful analysis of what the building looked like from the outside, we have cast serious doubt on the official Flight 77 story. And we still haven’t looked at the hijackers (the unlikelihood they could have gained control of the plane with knives and box cutters, the unlikelihood Hani Hanjour could have pulled off the incredible manoeuvre to hit the west side of the Pentagon, and the fact that they did not appear on the passenger list) or the bizarre behaviour of military and political figures that day.
Pentagon Crash has NO EVIDENCE of a jet-liner.
These 3 pictures are the only evidence whatsoever that an airliner crashed at the Pentagon
There seems to be a few 'clean & placed' pieces of plane, small enough to carry off, the lawn, which was undisturbed.
Not one seat cushion.
No Vertical Stabilizer
No wing sections
Nothing.... Nothing but pictures. And of course, these 'pieces' have since, conveniently disappeared and cannot be analyzed.
This piece of wreckage looks real, not planted! But unfortunately, it is not from a Boeing 757!
Official reaction to this photo / part, was to claim it is a HoneyWell rotor from the rear 'APU' engine in a Boeing 757's tail-section.
But, after studying these high-resolution photos, HoneyWell, the manufacturers of the supposed APU engines, said: "there is no way that is any part of a APU engine we manufacture"